FAQ | Sci-Fi News   RSS Facebook Twitter YouTube iTunes

GateWorld Blogs
ENLIGHTENMENT TAME STYLE
TAME, GATEWORLD FORUM MODERATOR

Thursday, January 01, 2009

Change and the New Year

If you read back through my Blog you will see many posts that say the same thing in various ways

"Be Decent", "Be Respectful", "Be Civil", "Be Tolerant", "Be Constructive".
These are constant themes in my blog when I write about the Forum.
As a Moderator I have seen a lot of how folks can be the opposite of all of the above. I have also seen many that are the epitome of the above.

So now that many in the *Internet Forum World* and those that visit GateWorld as guests, or as *Lurkers* have seen a continuous down-turn in those areas instead of an up-turn we are going to be implementing some changes.

One of those changes is to ask that folks who have a "Less-than-enthusiastic" feeling any longer, for all things Stargate, is to take a bit more time and actually explain why they feel this way in a manner that keeps all of the above in mind. Decent, respectful, civil and constructive.

Another of those changes will be a crack down on all of the folks who use words as a way to circumvent the respect rules. We have always erred on the side of member and given them the benefit of the doubt that they weren't *trying* to be that rude with their choice of words. That will no longer be the case. Now we will err on the side of the Forum and hold the comment up to an overall Community feeling we want to achieve. If it adheres to that spirit then it is good to go. If not, then it will just go. Some will also get some hand slaps if they are consistent in using word play to be rude, disrespectful or demeaning.

Last, we are not a place that wants to foster hatred of anything so we won't allow it to continue to grow and feed on itself in our Community.

I have read many arguments against this thought process. Not so much the "Spirit" of it but the wording of it. In my opinion the folks that are doing so much arguing are looking for loop-holes to still do what they do and get away with something. I am reminded of how my kids would try to find the chink in the rules or in the conversation we were having so they could find a way to vindicate their actions and not get punished "IF" they did this or that. Mind you that hadn't actually done anything yet but they wanted to ensure that they had escape routes already set up. As I read through the various arguments I kept returning to this thought.

Its also a form of manipulation. A means to try and take control of a situation that you actually have no real power over. The phrase "Methinks he doth protest to much" runs through my mind repeatedly as I read argument after argument.

Logic is a great manipulator of abstract thinking. If a concept has no black and white boundaries then a logical thinker is extremely uncomfortable with it and will strive to create them. Even when they do not exist anywhere except in the Logical thinker's mind. Then once they have created them, they act as if the boundaries have always been there and were actually intended as a conspiracy since they had to find them themselves instead of us just telling them about them.
This will in turn confound the Abstract thinker since they never intended for the boundary to be there but yet they find that instead of continuing to explain how the overall plan will work. They find themselves defending against these imaginary boundaries that the Logical thinker refuses to believe are not there.
It becomes a convoluted mess and at some point it is hoped that the Abstract thinker will throw up their hands and forget the whole idea and leave things the way they are because that is just easier. Thus the Logical thinker has avoided not only the boundaries they have created in their own mind but changing altogether. Which, was the objective in the first place.

Of course what ruins everything is having Logical thinkers that can also grasp the abstract as well as Abstract thinkers that can grasp the logical. When you have a group that can do this all bets are off for the masses because most of the normal tactics won't work and they will be seen for what they are. GateWorld has been blessed with a group of Moderators that are these people. They can see the forest for the trees and in fact can keep the Big picture in mind while dealing with one tree. Not all Forums have that.

So change will be coming. For some it will be too much and we will be sad to see them leave. For others it will be a welcome breath of fresh air, they will gladly move to the community and we will welcome them with open arms.

Through it all progression will be made and we will grow and that is always a good thing :-)

Posted by Tame :-) @ 6:31 PM   |  LINK



1 Comments:
Blogger dipsofjazz wrote:
12:59 PM     LINK

I always enjoy reading your blogs, Tame.

Here's to a happy 2009, both on the forum as well as in real life.


Post a Comment        Blog Home        GateWorld Home


Talk about this blog at GateWorld Forum >
GateWorld Home >

Blogs are the author's personal space and represent solely the views of the author, and not necessary those of GateWorld.net and its owner. Entries are not edited or reviewed by GateWorld before publication.

About the Author
Tame Tame is a sci-fi junkie who loves to read, watch movies, and who has too many pets. She grew up in the Midwest of the USA and now resides in sunny Arizona, and drives her 19-year-old twins batty ... and still makes her husband of 20 years laugh.


Links

Previous Posts

Archives

Working Mom

Stargate News
PREVIEW: 'Vegas'
Nye explores possibility of gate travel
Final Davis film premieres in January
Picardo: Atlantis finale is 'well-crafted'
Ratings stay even for 'Infection'
Doctor Who producer doesn't care for Stargate
SG-1 movie double feature coming to DVD
GateWorld Podcast: Episode #23
Robert Carlyle cast in Stargate Universe
'Enemy At the Gate,' 'Vegas' stories revealed!
Hewlett sorry to lose Atlantis
PREVIEW: 'Identity'

How would you rate SGU's "Life?"

Your Vote:


 1 >
5
Average
< 10
View results  -  Previous poll

Powered by Blogger    RSS Syndication   

WRITE TO US    LINK TO US    REPORT NEWS    PODCAST    FACEBOOK    PRIVACY    ADVERTISING    STAFF    SITE HISTORY
©2005-2006 Tame. All rights reserved. This material
may not be reprinted without written consent from the author.

"Stargate" and all related characters and images are the property of MGM
Television Entertainment. Please read the site's copyright notice.

©1999-2006 GateWorld. All rights reserved.

Store