FAQ | Sci-Fi News   RSS Facebook Twitter YouTube iTunes
Stargate News
Cooper: SGU has gay characters

Monday - April 20, 2009
Category: GENERAL | Tags:

Ming-Na ("Camille Wray")

Ming-Na (Camille Wray)

Beware of minor SPOILERS for the upcoming episode “Life” in the report below.

The third Stargate series will go where Stargate SG-1 and Atlantis didn’t: It will have gay characters. Stargate Universe series creators Robert C. Cooper and Brad Wright told fans during their stage panel at Creation Entertainment’s official Vancouver Stargate convention earlier this month.

“There are at least one and potentially more gay characters on Universe,” Cooper said in answer to a fan’s question.

Wright added, “There’s actually two.”

One of those characters is Camille Wray, the I.O.A. representative on board the Destiny, new casting documents reveal. The character is played by actress Ming-Na.

In the show’s seventh episode, “Life,” viewers will meet Wray’s long-time partner back on Earth, Sharon. The character is listed as a lead guest, and possibly recurring. Camille uses the Destiny’s long-range communications device to return home to Sharon for a brief respite.

Stargate Atlantis did have a few gay characters itself, at least in the minds of the producers — though it never made it onto the screen. Executive producer Joseph Mallozzi has stated that character of Alicia Vega was written to be a lesbian (story). But after her introduction in the Season Five premiere, she was quickly killed off in just her second appearance (“Whispers”).

Mallozzi also said that there was another character on Atlantis he always thought was gay, though the right time (read: not forced) to reveal it on screen never materialized.

The decision to include gay characters on Universe was born from the desire to focus the show on its characters and their relationships with one another.

“This goes towards our goal to make the characters on Universe as complex and complicated and realistic and identifiable as we can, to as many people as we can,” Cooper said. “And that’s not just a desire for ratings. That’s the desire to portray humanity, and make a show that is saying something about who we are.”

Stargate Universe premieres this fall on SCI FI Channel in the U.S., Sky1 in the U.K. and SPACE in Canada! Keep your browser locked on GateWorld’s own SGU Launch Center for more in the weeks ahead.

(Thanks to Morjana for the contributing)



DID YOU KNOW GATEWORLD IS ON TWITTER?
Follow us now for breaking Stargate news and site updates!


COMMENTS (267):Rules | Report Comment | Trackback

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 »

  • @Redlotus Oh I cant? I have a disability, as a side effect of this disability I have a speech impediment. Because of this speech impediment I’ve been treated differently my entire life, like I’m less of a person. I’ve been made fun of, ridiculed, excluded, and basically emotionally tortured. Did I chose to be this way? No its just the way I am. Now, would it be important to me if someone decided to make a huge thing out of a main character on a TV show having a speech impediment? No not really, why? I want to be treated NORMALLY not given special treatment.

    In short, you don’t know me or what I’ve been though, so please don’t make assumptions about me.

  • WOW! Eight pages of comments on a lesbian character. How many pages would there be it the character was, Trans gendered? Or OGM Gender assigned?

    I really am saddened on some of these posts. As a conservative Christian I taught that I was to love the sinner hate the sin. That was turned into by liberals, just love the sinner. All the while deep inside me I knew I was different. As a little girl I was always attracted to other little girls. Now hold on there I am not finished. Do not jump to conclusions. I was born with PAIS (Partial Androgen Insensitive Syndrome). I was genetically male but the gene that accepts the hormones that allows a fetus to develop in to a male child was disabled. I am still conservative and Christian and still believe it is not a choice whether we are gay, straight, or Trans. The God of my understanding is not confined to what the Bible says He must be. He is bigger than that and yes He likes diversity.

    Now, I loved SG~1. I enjoyed SGA. I am willing to give SGU a chance. Not because there is a gay/lesbian character, but because I want to believe there is more out there than just us. Also remember that Hitler’s ideas of what was right and what was wrong lead to a world war. Ha Ha Ha, just throwing out an absurd point of view.

  • Oh my… Only in America!

    You have a long way to go in accepting people who are ‘different’ than the majority.

    I find some comments about being gay abysmal.

    Saddening.

    I think it’s great and long overdue that a gay relationship is aknowledged on a Stargate TV series.

  • @Vyse99, you may have noticed that I aknowledged that I did NOT know for sure what your situation was, and invited you to correct me if I was wrong (which you clearly have). It was never my intention to insult or upset anyone, so I apologize if I have done so. You’re right, I don’t know you or what you have been through, and I shouldn’t have assumed. I’m sorry.

    Yes, being disabled can obviously cause people to be treated poorly, excluded, called names, etc. It’s wrong, and I’m sorry that you’ve had to deal with that.

    But I don’t see how including a gay character in a TV show is “special treatment” and I *STILL* don’t see how they are “making a huge thing” out of this. They created this character, who just happens to be gay. And people are freaking out over it. Have you ever heard of someone boycotting a show because it included someone who was in a wheelchair, or suffered from a disease? Has anyone even threatened your life or safety for being disabled, or protested and waved signs claiming that you’re going to hell? Has anyone ever accused you of *choosing* to be disabled, and asked you why you don’t just *choose* to be otherwise? Are you denied legal rights in this country for being disabled? I really hope not, I can tell you from personal experience it’s not fun. There are ways in which we are both discriminated against, and that is trully unfortunate. But it’s not the same experiences, and so something like SG including a gay character is going to mean different things to me than it is to you. Let me make clear, I am not implying that one situation is worse than the other, just different. The thing is, being gay, bisexual, or transgendered in this country (world) means that complete strangers, people who have never met you and have no idea who you are as a person, HATE you and actively work to limit your rights, and that’s a terrible feeling. So if I can turn on my TV and see just one character on a show who is gay, and is represented respectfully and realistically, what that means to me is that one more tiny little corner of our society sees us as PEOPLE, who are part of this world, and have stories worth telling just like anyone else. And maybe some young person who is struggling with their sexuality and feeling all alone will see that and feel a little better about who they are, even if all they have to hang on to is a fictional character. That MATTERS. And it’s not special treatment just to be aknowledged and included! I’m certainly not saying that every show has to, or even should have, an LGBT character. Just that it’s nice to be represented AT ALL.

    Again, I’m sorry for having insulted or upset you that trully was not my intention and I do apologize. You’re right, I don’t know what your experience has been. But please keep in mind that you have commented repeatedly now on a subject (homosexuality) that YOU do not understand on a personal level.

    But it’s late, I’m tired, and I should probably just stop trying to debate this issue right now since it seems to be turning into more of an argument, and that was never my intention.

  • @Redlotus I’m not saying having a gay character in a TV show is special treatment, I’m saying having a news headline about it is.

  • Also now that to further illustrate my point, when Adrian Conrad first appeared on SG-1 he was in a wheelchair did we see “SG-1 has disabled people” NO he was treated as just another character. Having a news headline “SGU has gay characters” is special treatment pure and simple.

  • Hey Everyone,

    I just wanted to say I think this is a good thing as gay people are part of society and should be represented on TV, my only concern as a lesbian myself is that its done tastefully and not a who’s sleeping with who this week kinda thing, (b/c the majority of us don’t act that way) then I am OK and happy to see a homosexual character in SGU.

    As for the religious view-point, I’m Catholic and constantly battle how my feelings for these to things conflict with each other but I can’t help who I am and what I feel, at the end of the day God knows who we are and judges no one for being who they are.

    I understand this is a very emotive topic for everyone whatever their views on the subject, but some of the comments have sadden me with the ‘heat’ of their words. Maybe we could all remember that everyone deserves to be respected and have the opportunity to voice their opinions. :)

  • Hi everybody!

    Gay =/= physically disabled, mentally disabled, black, religious, young, old, etc.

    You cannot put the two things on the same wavelength. Please don’t compare them. Thank you.

  • For those who do not like the idea of seeing human relationships on Stargate, I have some bad news. Right from the beginning, there was absolutely no mystery about it. Stargate Universe IS focusing on the human element. They never stated otherwise so there should be no confusion. If you are not interested in the characters and their interaction with one another, begone! This show will not change, its already filming.

  • Truly America is an intolerant nation who will not accept transformation in their favorite Sci-Fi series. *insert crying eagle picture*

    It’s okay if they focus on “the human element,” but I think the people who say it’s not going to be “who’s sleeping with who” are kidding themselves.
    Brief respite means “excuse for sex,” btw.

  • @Vladius Sure I can. People with disabilities get treated unfairly all the time, as have black people in the past. To put the fact that SGU has gay characters in the spotlight simply for being gay while not pointing out any other minorities or people that get unfair treatment is special attention. Even with religion, Jews, Christians, atheists, or any other “religion”(or lack there of) is being given unfair treatment(and in a lot of cases denied legal rights) at least some where in the world.

  • @Morticae I will not “begone” if there is something I don’t like a show I have every right to talk about it, freedom of speech after all. Telling someone to leave just because you don’t like what they say is pretty weak.

  • @Morticae I agree with @Vyse99 that we if we don’t like something we have a right to talk about it, if we don’t then they will think everyone likes it then they will continue if we wine and bitch about it then they will make more SG1 movies for us and maybe even another season for us.
    I don’t think ‘fans’ of the show should be hung out to dry for a new show that we do not like.
    If they we’re making this new show for the ‘fans’ then they would realize that fans are people who like a show and are fanatical about it and that if you are really fanatical about a show you wouldn’t want a thing about it to be change.
    So sorry Morticae but I want a show like SG1 which is not character based and if I make enough noise then someone might notice realize there is a market for a show like that and make it.
    So I shall use my right of freedom of speech to whine as much as I like thank you very much.

  • I can see it now. Newsflash: Controversial new show Stargate Universe will have WASPy heterosexuals in it. Gay black atheists hardest hit.

    You don’t need to announce something if it’s the norm. This isn’t the norm, so I’m glad it was announced.

  • @Vyse99, Sure, you can draw parallels, but they really aren’t the same thing. Loook at how you phrased your comment – black people have been treated unfairly “in the past” (yes, they still are by some people), and when you talk about religion and being denied rights, you are talking about “somewhere in the world,” not the US or Canada.

    There are laws to PROTECT people with religious differences, diasbilities, and minority ethnicities from discrimination. On the other hand, people actively lobby to put laws into place that LIMIT the rights of LBGT people. Public schools are legally required to be ADA accessible – but there’s nothing saying that a transgendered student has the right to a non-gender specific restroom. There are no laws saying that two people can’t get married because they are of differing abilities, or different races. In the state I live in, it would be considered a hate crime if someone were to assault a person simply for being Hispanic, or Muslim. If they beat me for being gay, it’s just assault, and has a much lesser penalty under the law. I could go on and on, but I won’t because this isn’t the place.

    Like I said before, sure, there are ignorant jerks who will be unkind about people having a disability, and people will always disagree on religion, but YOUR RIGHTS IN THIS COUNTRY ARE PROTECTED. Mine are not. The Americans with Disabilities Act was passed *19 YEARS AGO,* protecting your rights. The Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964, and prohibits discrimination based on race, religion, or sex. There are NO federal laws to protect LBGT people from discrimination. In fact, both the ADA and the Federal Rehabilitation Act (while defining trassexualism as a medical condition) explicitly exclude trans people from protection under those laws. There is a huge discrepency between the rights of LGBT people in this country compared to the rights of other minorities, and while there are similar individual experiences of being picked on or rejected for something you can’t help, legally speaking you are protected.

    The “special rights” or “special attention” argument has been a battle cry for those working against LGBT rights for a long time, when in fact all we want is equality like anyone else. Yes, you’re focusing on the fact that one website posted one tiny headline and pointed out one gay character as being “special attention”, not legal rights in general. But when you’ve been hit over the head with that argument in relation to your civil rights over and over again, it begins to take on an insulting and upsetting meaning. And I think that it seems pretty clear that you do have some sort of problem with LGBT people/lifestyles. Your last comment says “if there is something I don’t like [in] a show…” implying that you don’t like that there is a gay character included, and not just the “attention” given to it.

    The news is going to report on whatever people are going to be interested in hearing, regardless of how balanced that news is. It’s a fact of life, and I sugest you try to get used to it, or you’ll spend your life being frustrated and angry.

  • @kzap333, you don’t want ANYTHING to change? It’s a totally different show! Of course it’s going to be different. Maybe it’ll lose some fans who are unwilling to even give it a chance (like yourself) but on the otherhand, maybe some people who found SG1 or SGA not quite to their taste will find themselves really enjoying SGU. It’s a trade-off, and I think it’s silly to think that the writers and producers have some sort of obligation to “not rock the boat” and limit their creative vision in order to avoid upsetting people who are unaccepting of change. Shows evolve over time. Franchises evolve over time. It’s a reality.

    @Vladius, thank you for putting so succinctly what I keep trying to get accross. Well put.

  • With the casting of Robert Carlisle I was actually starting to come around to this after the 90210 in Space rap. With endless cameos by Stargate actors and now this it’s back on the I don’t care list again.

  • @Vyse99,kzap333: Get out the Kleenex! I never stated that you couldn’t argue your opinions, I summarized it quite clearly with this: “If you are not interested in the characters and their interaction with one another, begone!”

    Specifically, that was for those who claimed not to necessarily be homophobes but claimed they didn’t want to see relationships of ANY SORT in the show. I’m just saying, lets get real. For those people, they are screwed. That is what this show is going to focus on. I’m sorry if that isn’t the spinoff of your dreams, sometimes you have to part ways with shows. I’m sure every single mature TV viewer has had to at some point.

    Oh, and you’re screwed too, if you are homophobic. Do you realize they are already filming the series, and in fact are currently filming the specific episode “Life” right now where we meet Sharons long term partner? You can grunt and grumble all you please, just be realistic and don’t expect them to rewrite and refilm everything to please your homophobia.

    That said, you can always enjoy SG-1 and/or SGA movies. Pray that SGU is successful because it has been stated that if this show fails, Stargate will most likely be wrapped up in terms of a tv series anyway. Perhaps if this is successful you will get another spinoff that meets your tastes. They are putting in a lot of time and effort into SGU and I think it will pay off.

  • @Redlotus What do laws have to do with being given special attention on a TV show’s site? I mean do you think gay people deserve special attention on a TV show(and a site about the show) because you think they are misrepresented legally? In any event there are more forms of discrimination around then those covered by the law. Growing up I’ve been picked on and rejected myself a lot for something that I couldn’t control, was I protected? No it was just my word against theirs. If I said anything about it at all to authority figures such as teachers, the picking on just got worse and worse.

    Also I wasn’t implying anything of the sort when I said if I don’t like something I’ll speak out about it, I was referring to the relationship focus of the show just like I clearly stated earlier, not specially gay and lesbian relationships. Again stop assuming things, this is the second time you’ve done it, and frankly it gets tiring when people look for persecution in places that it doesn’t exist.

    And spend my life being angry and frustrated? I have too much going for me to have my life be consumed by “anger and frustration” over a TV show.

  • @Morticae If this style of show truly is the future of Stargate then I don’t care if it fails, from what it seems the Stargate franchise that I love died when Atlantis was canceled(with the exception of the movies that keep getting pushed back). Also you seem to be getting pretty defensive here, with the whole “Get out the Kleenex! ” no one called for any rewrites. I’m just a long time Stargate fan on a Stargate website saying I don’t approve of the franchise’s new direction.

  • @vyse99, You brought up legal rights in your previous post, so I was responding to that. You also made a statement that being gay and being disabled or of an ethnic minority were comparable in terms of the way society treats you and the way you are discriminated against, and I was attempting to point out the major differences. Those differences play a part in why GW decided to post a story about a gay character, but did not make a headline out of having a black character etc. You will also notice that I made a point of aknowledging that discrimination occurs in many ways, and that the law does not always protect people. The point being that if you are LGBT in this country, you put up with that sort of discrimination (being picked on, called names, not protected by authority, etc) but LBGT people also have the added burden of not being protected on a larger legal scale.

    But again we are straying off-topic here, and it’s becoming clear that we have very different views on this subject. I don’t want this to dissolve into knit-picking and argument, so perhaps we should just agree to disagree.

    At any rate, I am glad to see gay people represented in SGU, and Sci Fi in general, and I applaud the producers and writers for deciding to go forward with it despite knowing that it would not be a popular desicion with some. I’m really looking forward to SGU (even before this news “came out.” :) and I’m hoping that once it airs and people give it a chance, they’ll enjoy it. I at least implore people to give it a chance before condeming it completely. At best, I think some people might be pleasantly surprised. At worst, you’ve given up an hour. Not such a bad gamble.

  • @Morticae
    I hope SGU isn’t successful because although it may mean less investors choose to put money in the SG franchise at least the creators will work on something different that I might like. I’m not going to stop people watching the show but I won’t advertise it to anyone I know and won’t watch it myself and just hope it fails. Because the creators said they don’t want to work on more than one show at a time so the quicker this one is over and done with the quicker we can move on.

    @redlotus Yes I don’t want anything to change, is that so hard to believe if something is perfect why change it.
    It would be like saying I have made the perfect cake which is perfect in every way and could not get any better but I’m going to change it any way just so people don’t get bored.

  • Gosh, I can’t believe I’m commenting twice on this but you people are so unreal. TORCHWOOD handles gay just fine thank you. In REAL life the actor who plays Jack is GAY and the fun way in which he portrays it on the screen makes the whole thing disarming and honest. He doesn’t flaunt nor does he hide. Again, more people in this world have died due to your religions and that my dear people is what should make you sick! How you treat others is how I would define a person, certainly not his/her sexuality. STARGATE is just reflecting the diversity in the Universe. You that mention disgust, look in the mirror.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 »



RSS FEEDS | DISCUSS AT GATEWORLD FORUM >

©2006-2009 GateWorld.net. All rights reserved. This material may not be reprinted without written consent from GateWorld. Click here to learn more.


Apple iTunes

News by Category
RSS FEEDS


Stargate News

Working Mom

Entertainment Earth

Stargate News

On the Web...

How would you rate SGU's "Life?"

Your Vote:


 1 >
5
Average
< 10
View results  -  Previous poll


WRITE TO US    LINK TO US    REPORT NEWS    PODCAST    FACEBOOK    PRIVACY    ADVERTISING    STAFF    SITE HISTORY
Add GateWorld Headlines To Your Site!

"Stargate" and all related characters and images are the property of MGM
Television Entertainment. Please read the site's copyright notice.

©1999-2009 GateWorld LLC. All rights reserved.

Store